Sir, I would just like to offer my opinions on this discussion. I believe

the argument as to who is more 'honourable' to be a rather pointless one.

It is clear that you both have different codes that you follow, and who is

'right' or 'wrong' is not really the point.

For example, my own code of honour means that if Arthor attacks someone in

front of me I am liable to try and protect them. He obviously considers this

'teaming' and unacceptable, and will seek 'justice' from me at a later time.

I am confident that I behave in a manner befitting my guild, city and order,

and do not feel I have to justify myself to Arthor. I will continue to follow

my own code of honour, as I am sure he will continue to follow his.

Of course like many things in this world, it comes down to who is the stronger

combatant. Arthor is undeniably a better fighter than I (ok, so most people

are) and until such time as I can improve, I expect him to seek to enforce

his own code of honour on me. We must all continue to behave in a way true

to our beliefs, and if this brings us into conflict then so be it.

Yours in compassion,

Sir Randon, the reasonable knight

Written by my hand on the 4th of Mournsend, in the year 1031.